Brand new researcher taught the next coder on an alternative percentage of the details, and 10% of your own investigation try coded together. The second coder did blind towards the researcher’s coding, each token is separate, relying just for you to mode. Playing with Cohen’s Kappa, the arrangement is actually seen to be reasonable (? = 0.73) within researcher as well as the next coder.
Findings and Discussion
Which part evaluations this new volume and functions people-statements in detail. In addition, the manner in which you-comments are accustomed to represent, signal, and you will contour the dreamed audience was talked about.
Regularity and functions of you-Statements
Each of the 265 pages is analyzed on exposure of you-declaration tokens. A maximum of 202 users makers (76.3%) decided to play with at least one style of your-statement when caused from the OkCupid’s screen. Therefore, caused Your-statements tends to be said to be a fairly well-known occurrence for the OkCupid users. It selecting is actually lined up on the notion one affordances affect the choices out of pages by providing a structure (boyd, 2006, 2010; Hogan, 2010; Litt, 2012). Yet not, it is well worth detailing you to definitely 23.7% of reputation users chosen not to utilize the 8th quick appealing your-comments, and therefore affirms van Lier’s (2000) observation one to affordances render but never force step.
This new 202 character suppliers together produced 496 your-statements. Just like the present in Dining table 1, fourteen functions otherwise themes were recognized when you look at the thematic posts analysis. Per motif was noted featuring its relevant token number and you may commission.
Analogy tokens off for each motif are supplied below when you look at the Dining table 2. No-one motif accounted for over regarding the 13% of the tokens, and some users functioning multiple kinds of you-statements to their profiles. Continue reading “The second coder classified the newest tokens on 14 attributes to dictate the fresh interrater arrangement coefficient”